Digital Marketing Agency | SEO, Paid Social & PPC

Are Core Web Vitals A Google Ranking Factor?

Share This Post

Core Web Vitals measure signals of page experience to guarantee an immersive user interaction during search activities. However, is there a correlation between Core Web Vitals and your organic search standings?

Continue reading to discover if there is any link between Core Web Vitals and enhanced Google rankings.

What Are Core Web Vitals?

Core Web Vitals are a set of specific factors that measure the user experience and performance of a website. These vitals are considered crucial by search engines, particularly Google, in evaluating and ranking web pages. The Core Web Vitals include the following three metrics:

  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): This metric measures the loading performance of a web page. It specifically looks at the time it takes for the largest content element (such as an image or text block) to become visible to the user.
  • First Input Delay (FID): FID assesses the interactivity of a web page by measuring the time it takes for a user to interact with the page, such as clicking a button, after the page has started loading.
  • Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): CLS evaluates the visual stability of a webpage. It quantifies how much the content shifts or moves around as the page loads, affecting user experience.

Are Core Web Vitals A Google Ranking Factor?

These metrics are part of Google’s initiative to prioritize user experience in web search rankings. Websites that perform well in these Core Web Vitals are likely to offer a more satisfying experience for users, and therefore, may see positive effects on their search engine rankings. It’s essential for website owners and developers to monitor and optimize these metrics to enhance overall user satisfaction and maintain or improve search rankings. Keep in mind that algorithm updates may occur, and it’s advisable to stay informed about any changes in search engine ranking criteria.

According to web.dev are:

Core Web Vitals are the subset of Web Vitals that apply to all web pages, should be measured by all site owners, and will be surfaced across all Google tools.

Each of the Core Web Vitals represents a distinct facet of the user experience, is measurable in the field, and reflects the real-world experience of a critical user-centric outcome.

Starting from March 2024, Interaction to Next Paint (INP) is set to take over the role of First Input Delay (FID) as one of the Core Web Vitals metrics.

INP is a metric that assesses a page’s overall responsiveness to user interactions by observing the latency of all click, tap, and keyboard interactions that occur throughout the lifespan of a user’s visit to a page. The final INP value is the longest interaction observed, ignoring outliers.

The primary distinctions between FID and INP are outlined below:

FID measures the duration from a user’s initial interaction with a page (such as clicks or taps) to the point when the browser can react to event handlers for that interaction. It specifically emphasizes the first input received during the page load. Its purpose is to measure the initial impression a user forms regarding a website’s interactivity and responsiveness.

In contrast, INP measures the duration from any user interaction, including clicks, taps, and key presses, to the moment when the subsequent frame is painted with visual feedback. This assessment consists of all interactions throughout a page’s lifecycle, not limited to the first input during the initial page load.

The aim is to evaluate a page’s comprehensive responsiveness to user input. An INP of 200 milliseconds or less signifies excellent responsiveness, while anything surpassing this threshold indicates a need for improvement.

How to Create Mobile-Friendly Contents

The Proof: Core Web Vitals As A Ranking Factor

In the year 2020, Google Search Central provided an early announcement of the ranking signals pertaining to the forthcoming page experience metrics known as Core Web Vitals.

The associated blog post outlined the following:

Earlier this month, the Chrome team announced Core Web Vitals, a set of metrics related to speed, responsiveness and visual stability, to help site owners measure user experience on the web.

Today, we’re building on this work and providing an early look at an upcoming Search ranking change that incorporates these page experience metrics.

We will introduce a new signal that combines Core Web Vitals with our existing signals for page experience to provide a holistic picture of the quality of a user’s experience on a web page.

In 2021, Google conducted a thirty-minute “Ask me anything” session focusing on Web Vitals. Within this session, a participant inquired about whether page experience functions as a binary ranking factor.

Philip Walton, a Google engineer specializing in web performance, responded that, for the most part, Web Vitals were not considered a binary ranking factor.

In the same AMA, John Mueller, a Google Search Advocate, affirmed that while Core Web Vitals (CWV) do influence rankings, relevance remains a significant factor. He clarified that if website X is faster than website Y but Y is more pertinent to the search user’s query, website Y would still take precedence over X.

Mueller further highlighted that websites transitioning from a “needs improvement” status to a “good” status might experience ranking improvements. However, websites already classified as “good” that improve speed by a marginal amount may not witness changes in their rankings.

In 2021, Google revised the initial blog announcement for Core Web Vitals, confirming that the page experience rollout would conclude in August of that year.

Moving ahead to September 2022, Mueller referenced the page experience ranking factor in a Reddit comment regarding accurate speed testing tools.

“If you pop over to web.dev, you’ll see that Google has a bunch of metrics, more than just a single number score.

Some of these are grouped together as “core web vitals”, and have ways that you can determine them in the field (using “real user metrics” [RUM] – what they actually saw) as well as “lab tests” (so you can test things on your side). Google uses the real user metrics / field data for core web vitals for search in the page experience ranking factor.

My recommendation is to use the core web vitals field data (it’s also called Chrome User-Experience Report data / CRUX, there are various ways to access it) as a way of getting a baseline for important pages within your site (pages will vary!).

Then use the lab tests for core web vitals to try to reproduce that, and then work with your developers to fix the issues. The lab tests let you try things out quickly, and see if there’s an effect. The field data takes about a month to update.”

Jumping ahead to April 2023, Google took steps to “simplify” its guidance concerning page experience signals in search rankings.

Although Google advises the upkeep of robust Core Web Vitals (CWV) for an enhanced user experience and still integrates these metrics as ranking signals, enhancements in one or more metrics no longer ensure improved rankings.

Page experience remains an important ranking factor but is now assessed comprehensively by Google’s core ranking systems, moving away from a singular “page experience signal.”

In July 2023, Mueller provided an update to Google Search Central audiences on YouTube, mentioning the integration of Interaction to Next Paint (INP) into Core Web Vitals scheduled for 2024.

SEO Metrics: What are they and why do they matter?

Core Web Vitals Are Truly A Google Ranking Factor

Google has verified that Core Web Vitals play a role in influencing rankings in search results. However, it’s important to note that they don’t operate as an independent ranking “system”; instead, they contribute to the assessment of page experience. These metrics hold significance within the framework of the helpful content ranking system and contribute to the overall signals for page experience.

For guidance on enhancing user experience and rankings, Google’s web.dev documentation provides recommendations on improving metrics such as Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), First Input Delay (FID), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), and the forthcoming Interaction to Next Paint (INP).

Would you like to read more about “Are Core Web Vitals A Google Ranking Factor” related articles? If so, we invite you to take a look at our other tech topics before you leave!

Use our Internet marketing service to help you rank on the first page of SERP.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best